Skip to main content

Public validation record

2026 Football Model Performance

These results use official OSPR projections locked before kickoff and evaluated against final scores. Mirrored schedule records and live forecasts are excluded.

Evaluated through Oct 15, 2026

Accuracy calculated Oct 16, 2026 8:00 AM EDT

Reset

Performance summary

2,842 games evaluated with ospr-2026.1

Games evaluated

2,842

Winner accuracy

68.5%

1,947 correct

Average margin error

22.5

Lower is better

Average score error

13.3

Per-team points

Brier score

0.203

Probability accuracy

Close projection rate

14.1%

Correct and within 7

Regular season vs. playoffs

A direct comparison using the selected season, week, team, and OSPR model version.

Regular season

Games
2,842
Winner accuracy
68.5%
Margin error
22.5

Playoffs

Games
0
Winner accuracy
—
Margin error
—

Performance by week

Results for the selected model version and season phase.

Week Games Winner accuracy Margin error
Week 1 355 58.3% 22.0
Week 2 351 61.0% 23.3
Week 3 358 62.3% 21.9
Week 4 354 65.3% 23.5
Week 5 356 74.4% 22.6
Week 6 357 80.4% 22.7
Week 7 358 75.4% 22.0
Week 8 348 71.3% 21.8
Week 9 4 25.0% 26.2

Probability calibration

Observed win rate should approach the average predicted probability as sample sizes grow.

Probability Games Predicted Observed Gap Brier
0–9% 13 8.5% 7.7% -0.8 0.069
10–19% 178 15.9% 9.6% -6.4 0.091
20–29% 302 25.5% 23.2% -2.3 0.178
30–39% 445 35.1% 35.1% 0.0 0.227
40–49% 562 45.1% 43.6% -1.5 0.245
50–59% 478 54.9% 57.7% +2.9 0.247
60–69% 404 64.8% 71.0% +6.2 0.205
70–79% 325 74.8% 79.7% +4.9 0.162
80–89% 128 84.0% 86.7% +2.7 0.113
90–99% 7 91.9% 85.7% -6.1 0.127

Performance by prediction confidence

Newer snapshots use historical calibration and comparable sample size. Legacy snapshots fall back to rating-evidence confidence.

Confidence Games Winner accuracy Average margin error
High 2,368 69.6% 22.4 points
Medium 31 80.6% 23.7 points
Low 443 61.9% 22.6 points

Performance by risk indicator

A game may appear in more than one group because indicators describe different kinds of uncertainty.

Indicator Games Winner accuracy Average margin error
Limited Data 1,515 62.4% 22.9 points
Close Game 2,021 62.8% 22.3 points
Upset Possible 1,886 61.9% 22.1 points
Blowout Range 1 100.0% 23.8 points

Largest misses

The largest margin errors in this selection. A miss is a model result to learn from, not automatically a data error.

Date Matchup Projected Final Margin error
Sep 11, 2026 Farrell vs. Reynolds 25–24 84–0 82.5 points
Sep 25, 2026 Normandy vs. Rocky River 14–28 0–83 68.7 points
Sep 18, 2026 Trotwood-Madison vs. Taft 23–17 72–0 65.6 points
Sep 26, 2026 Bedford vs. Cleveland JFK 18–17 66–0 64.8 points
Sep 18, 2026 John Adams vs. Cleveland JFK 16–18 68–6 64.4 points

Evaluated games

The game-level record behind the summary above.

Sep 25, 2026

Westland vs. Dublin Scioto

Correct
Projected
25–15
Final
49–14
Projected winner
Westland
Margin error
24.7

Sep 25, 2026

Westerville North vs. Westerville South

Correct
Projected
23–18
Final
23–7
Projected winner
Westerville North
Margin error
11.0

Sep 25, 2026

Thomas Worthington vs. Olentangy

Missed
Projected
21–17
Final
14–49
Projected winner
Thomas Worthington
Margin error
38.8

Sep 25, 2026

Reynoldsburg vs. Logan

Correct
Projected
22–17
Final
41–7
Projected winner
Reynoldsburg
Margin error
28.8

Sep 25, 2026

Pickerington North vs. Westerville Central

Correct
Projected
27–20
Final
45–7
Projected winner
Pickerington North
Margin error
30.7

Sep 25, 2026

Newark vs. Canal Winchester

Missed
Projected
22–21
Final
14–44
Projected winner
Newark
Margin error
30.6

Sep 25, 2026

Lancaster vs. Pickerington Central

Correct
Projected
19–22
Final
7–40
Projected winner
Pickerington Central
Margin error
30.9

Sep 25, 2026

Hilliard Davidson vs. Olentangy Orange

Correct
Projected
19–22
Final
6–25
Projected winner
Olentangy Orange
Margin error
15.7

Sep 25, 2026

Hilliard Darby vs. Olentangy Berlin

Missed
Projected
25–20
Final
19–20
Projected winner
Hilliard Darby
Margin error
5.7

Sep 25, 2026

Hilliard Bradley vs. Upper Arlington

Missed
Projected
26–22
Final
7–24
Projected winner
Hilliard Bradley
Margin error
21.3

Sep 25, 2026

Groveport-Madison vs. Teays Valley

Correct
Projected
24–20
Final
21–12
Projected winner
Groveport-Madison
Margin error
4.1

Sep 25, 2026

Grove City vs. New Albany

Missed
Projected
23–22
Final
21–28
Projected winner
Grove City
Margin error
7.6

Sep 25, 2026

Gahanna Lincoln vs. Central Crossing

Correct
Projected
25–16
Final
38–0
Projected winner
Gahanna Lincoln
Margin error
28.8

Sep 25, 2026

Whitmer vs. Anthony Wayne

Correct
Projected
26–20
Final
10–7
Projected winner
Whitmer
Margin error
2.7

Sep 25, 2026

Start vs. Rogers

Correct
Projected
19–16
Final
26–12
Projected winner
Start
Margin error
11.2

Sep 25, 2026

Springboro vs. Springfield

Missed
Projected
23–22
Final
20–24
Projected winner
Springboro
Margin error
6.0

Sep 25, 2026

Perrysburg vs. Northview

Correct
Projected
28–14
Final
62–0
Projected winner
Perrysburg
Margin error
47.3

Sep 25, 2026

Northmont vs. Wayne

Correct
Projected
16–23
Final
24–49
Projected winner
Wayne
Margin error
17.5

Sep 25, 2026

Middletown vs. Sycamore

Correct
Projected
21–17
Final
41–0
Projected winner
Middletown
Margin error
36.7

Sep 25, 2026

Fairmont vs. Miamisburg

Correct
Projected
18–24
Final
21–22
Projected winner
Miamisburg
Margin error
5.2

Sep 25, 2026

Findlay vs. Oregon Clay

Correct
Projected
20–27
Final
28–29
Projected winner
Oregon Clay
Margin error
6.4

Sep 25, 2026

Dublin Jerome vs. Marysville

Correct
Projected
20–19
Final
45–12
Projected winner
Dublin Jerome
Margin error
31.5

Sep 25, 2026

Dublin Coffman vs. Olentangy Liberty

Missed
Projected
21–20
Final
3–31
Projected winner
Dublin Coffman
Margin error
29.0

Sep 25, 2026

Delaware Hayes vs. Worthington Kilbourne

Correct
Projected
14–31
Final
7–38
Projected winner
Worthington Kilbourne
Margin error
14.8

Sep 25, 2026

Beavercreek vs. Centerville

Correct
Projected
25–15
Final
21–20
Projected winner
Beavercreek
Margin error
9.4

How to interpret these numbers

Winner accuracy shows whether OSPR favored the team that won. Average margin error shows how far the projected point margin was from the final margin.

Brier score measures probability quality from 0 to 1; lower is better. Calibration compares predicted win probabilities with observed outcomes.

Small groups can swing sharply, so every percentage is shown with its evaluated game count.

Injuries, roster changes, weather, and information not reflected in recorded results may affect individual games.