Skip to main content

Public validation record

2026 Football Model Performance

These results use official OSPR projections locked before kickoff and evaluated against final scores. Mirrored schedule records and live forecasts are excluded.

Evaluated through Oct 10, 2026

Accuracy calculated Oct 11, 2026 8:00 AM EDT

Reset

Performance summary

348 games evaluated with ospr-2026.1

Games evaluated

348

Winner accuracy

71.3%

248 correct

Average margin error

21.8

Lower is better

Average score error

13.3

Per-team points

Brier score

0.181

Probability accuracy

Close projection rate

15.2%

Correct and within 7

Regular season vs. playoffs

A direct comparison using the selected season, week, team, and OSPR model version.

Regular season

Games
348
Winner accuracy
71.3%
Margin error
21.8

Playoffs

Games
0
Winner accuracy
—
Margin error
—

Performance by week

Results for the selected model version and season phase.

Week Games Winner accuracy Margin error
Week 8 348 71.3% 21.8

Probability calibration

Observed win rate should approach the average predicted probability as sample sizes grow.

Probability Games Predicted Observed Gap Brier
0–9% 6 8.1% 16.7% +8.6 0.140
10–19% 37 15.2% 5.4% -9.8 0.061
20–29% 27 25.0% 22.2% -2.7 0.171
30–39% 40 35.2% 27.5% -7.7 0.193
40–49% 63 45.3% 49.2% +3.9 0.249
50–59% 59 55.2% 59.3% +4.2 0.243
60–69% 37 64.3% 59.5% -4.9 0.232
70–79% 48 74.9% 83.3% +8.4 0.140
80–89% 27 84.3% 92.6% +8.3 0.075
90–99% 4 91.4% 100.0% +8.6 0.007

Performance by prediction confidence

Newer snapshots use historical calibration and comparable sample size. Legacy snapshots fall back to rating-evidence confidence.

Confidence Games Winner accuracy Average margin error
High 338 70.7% 21.6 points
Medium 10 90.0% 28.3 points
Low 0 — —

Performance by risk indicator

A game may appear in more than one group because indicators describe different kinds of uncertainty.

Indicator Games Winner accuracy Average margin error
Close Game 210 59.5% 19.5 points
Upset Possible 199 59.3% 19.4 points
Limited Data 5 40.0% 26.0 points
Blowout Range 1 100.0% 23.8 points

Largest misses

The largest margin errors in this selection. A miss is a model result to learn from, not automatically a data error.

Date Matchup Projected Final Margin error
Oct 9, 2026 Bellbrook vs. Monroe 21–26 56–0 60.6 points
Oct 9, 2026 Norwalk vs. Perkins 12–29 0–75 58.3 points
Oct 9, 2026 Erie Mason vs. Whiteford 14–28 0–72 58.0 points
Oct 9, 2026 Waterford vs. Federal Hocking 25–15 68–0 58.0 points
Oct 9, 2026 Blanchester vs. Williamsburg 23–20 18–69 54.3 points

Evaluated games

The game-level record behind the summary above.

Oct 9, 2026

Martins Ferry vs. Barnesville

Missed
Projected
27–25
Final
21–25
Projected winner
Martins Ferry
Margin error
6.0

Oct 9, 2026

Youngstown Liberty vs. LaBrae

Correct
Projected
26–21
Final
35–0
Projected winner
Youngstown Liberty
Margin error
30.3

Oct 9, 2026

Grand Valley vs. Cardinal

Correct
Projected
23–14
Final
40–12
Projected winner
Grand Valley
Margin error
18.2

Oct 9, 2026

Garrettsville Garfield vs. Newton Falls

Correct
Projected
29–16
Final
50–14
Projected winner
Garrettsville Garfield
Margin error
23.6

Oct 9, 2026

Crestwood vs. Fairview Park

Correct
Projected
21–19
Final
28–21
Projected winner
Crestwood
Margin error
5.3

Oct 9, 2026

Conneaut vs. Rootstown

Correct
Projected
23–20
Final
35–14
Projected winner
Conneaut
Margin error
17.5

Oct 9, 2026

Champion vs. Columbiana Crestview

Missed
Projected
20–19
Final
0–40
Projected winner
Champion
Margin error
40.2

Oct 9, 2026

Bellaire vs. Harrison Central

Correct
Projected
21–18
Final
34–0
Projected winner
Bellaire
Margin error
31.2

Oct 9, 2026

Beachwood vs. Kirtland

Correct
Projected
17–27
Final
0–59
Projected winner
Kirtland
Margin error
48.7

Oct 9, 2026

Wyoming vs. Finneytown

Correct
Projected
30–11
Final
51–0
Projected winner
Wyoming
Margin error
32.1

Oct 9, 2026

Waynesville vs. Middletown Madison

Correct
Projected
27–13
Final
45–7
Projected winner
Waynesville
Margin error
24.9

Oct 9, 2026

Waverly vs. Wheelersburg

Missed
Projected
25–22
Final
20–27
Projected winner
Waverly
Margin error
10.5

Oct 9, 2026

Unioto vs. Chillicothe Huntington

Correct
Projected
25–23
Final
42–14
Projected winner
Unioto
Margin error
26.1

Oct 9, 2026

Taylor vs. Deer Park

Correct
Projected
13–32
Final
14–31
Projected winner
Deer Park
Margin error
2.3

Oct 9, 2026

Oakwood vs. Carlisle

Correct
Projected
27–20
Final
27–14
Projected winner
Oakwood
Margin error
5.2

Oct 9, 2026

Norwood vs. Cincinnati Country Day

Correct
Projected
13–24
Final
0–41
Projected winner
Cincinnati Country Day
Margin error
29.8

Oct 9, 2026

Springfield Northwestern vs. North Union

Correct
Projected
13–28
Final
0–54
Projected winner
North Union
Margin error
39.5

Oct 9, 2026

Dayton Northridge vs. Covington

Correct
Projected
20–22
Final
13–33
Projected winner
Covington
Margin error
17.6

Oct 9, 2026

Milton-Union vs. Miami East

Correct
Projected
16–27
Final
0–32
Projected winner
Miami East
Margin error
21.4

Oct 9, 2026

Kenton Ridge vs. Urbana

Correct
Projected
25–24
Final
21–14
Projected winner
Kenton Ridge
Margin error
6.6

Oct 9, 2026

Indian Hill vs. Madeira

Correct
Projected
28–19
Final
35–0
Projected winner
Indian Hill
Margin error
26.4

Oct 9, 2026

Graham Local vs. Springfield Shawnee

Correct
Projected
29–15
Final
49–0
Projected winner
Graham Local
Margin error
35.1

Oct 9, 2026

Eaton vs. Brookville

Missed
Projected
20–21
Final
62–48
Projected winner
Brookville
Margin error
15.3

Oct 9, 2026

Bethel-Tate vs. Clermont Northeastern

Correct
Projected
16–21
Final
9–13
Projected winner
Clermont Northeastern
Margin error
1.5

Oct 9, 2026

Vincent Warren vs. Richmond Edison

Missed
Projected
19–20
Final
29–28
Projected winner
Richmond Edison
Margin error
1.2

How to interpret these numbers

Winner accuracy shows whether OSPR favored the team that won. Average margin error shows how far the projected point margin was from the final margin.

Brier score measures probability quality from 0 to 1; lower is better. Calibration compares predicted win probabilities with observed outcomes.

Small groups can swing sharply, so every percentage is shown with its evaluated game count.

Injuries, roster changes, weather, and information not reflected in recorded results may affect individual games.