Skip to main content

Public validation record

2026 Football Model Performance

These results use official OSPR projections locked before kickoff and evaluated against final scores. Mirrored schedule records and live forecasts are excluded.

Evaluated through Aug 29, 2026

Accuracy calculated Aug 31, 2026 9:59 AM EDT

Reset

Performance summary

707 games evaluated with ospr-2026.1

Games evaluated

707

Winner accuracy

59.7%

422 correct

Average margin error

22.6

Lower is better

Average score error

13.1

Per-team points

Brier score

0.236

Probability accuracy

Close projection rate

12.4%

Correct and within 7

Regular season vs. playoffs

A direct comparison using the selected season, week, team, and OSPR model version.

Regular season

Games
707
Winner accuracy
59.7%
Margin error
22.6

Playoffs

Games
0
Winner accuracy
Margin error

Performance by week

Results for the selected model version and season phase.

Week Games Winner accuracy Margin error
Week 1 355 58.3% 22.0
Week 2 351 61.0% 23.3

Probability calibration

Observed win rate should approach the average predicted probability as sample sizes grow.

Probability Games Predicted Observed Gap Brier
0–9% 1 8.5% 0.0% -8.5 0.007
10–19% 32 16.7% 18.8% +2.0 0.160
20–29% 81 25.9% 34.6% +8.6 0.234
30–39% 117 35.2% 40.2% +5.0 0.237
40–49% 167 45.5% 48.5% +3.0 0.250
50–59% 128 54.6% 50.8% -3.8 0.256
60–69% 96 65.2% 67.7% +2.6 0.217
70–79% 73 74.6% 68.5% -6.1 0.218
80–89% 12 83.1% 58.3% -24.7 0.301

Performance by prediction confidence

Newer snapshots use historical calibration and comparable sample size. Legacy snapshots fall back to rating-evidence confidence.

Confidence Games Winner accuracy Average margin error
High 252 55.6% 22.8 points
Medium 21 76.2% 21.5 points
Low 434 61.3% 22.5 points

Performance by risk indicator

A game may appear in more than one group because indicators describe different kinds of uncertainty.

Indicator Games Winner accuracy Average margin error
Limited Data 706 59.6% 22.6 points
Close Game 535 56.8% 22.8 points
Upset Possible 505 56.0% 22.4 points

Largest misses

The largest margin errors in this selection. A miss is a model result to learn from, not automatically a data error.

Date Matchup Projected Final Margin error
Aug 21, 2026 Anna vs. Spencerville 19–22 60–0 63.2 points
Aug 29, 2026 Warrensville Heights vs. Cleveland JFK 18–20 57–0 59.2 points
Aug 28, 2026 West Clermont vs. Anderson 24–17 19–70 58.8 points
Aug 28, 2026 Ross vs. Thurgood Marshall 19–20 57–0 57.4 points
Aug 29, 2026 John Marshall vs. Rocky River 17–24 0–63 56.8 points

Evaluated games

The game-level record behind the summary above.

Aug 21, 2026

Troy Christian vs. Twin Valley South

Missed
Projected
17–18
Final
41–0
Projected winner
Twin Valley South
Margin error
41.7

Aug 21, 2026

Franklin Furnace Green vs. Federal Hocking

Correct
Projected
17–16
Final
38–32
Projected winner
Franklin Furnace Green
Margin error
5.5

Aug 21, 2026

Fayetteville-Perry vs. Manchester

Missed
Projected
13–23
Final
36–0
Projected winner
Manchester
Margin error
46.3

Aug 21, 2026

Cedarville vs. Cincinnati College Prep

Correct
Projected
22–24
Final
0–30
Projected winner
Cincinnati College Prep
Margin error
27.5

Aug 21, 2026

Ansonia vs. Riverside

Correct
Projected
25–21
Final
32–8
Projected winner
Ansonia
Margin error
19.6

Aug 21, 2026

South Gallia vs. Racine Southern

Correct
Projected
22–20
Final
32–30
Projected winner
South Gallia
Margin error
0.7

Aug 21, 2026

Millersport vs. Sciotoville East

Correct
Projected
19–15
Final
14–0
Projected winner
Millersport
Margin error
10.8

Aug 21, 2026

Waynesfield-Goshen vs. Mississinawa Valley

Correct
Projected
20–19
Final
32–0
Projected winner
Waynesfield-Goshen
Margin error
31.0

Aug 21, 2026

Hardin Northern vs. Toledo Christian

Correct
Projected
19–20
Final
6–26
Projected winner
Toledo Christian
Margin error
19.1

Aug 21, 2026

Edgerton vs. Edon

Missed
Projected
24–22
Final
7–40
Projected winner
Edgerton
Margin error
34.8

Aug 21, 2026

Arcadia vs. Cory-Rawson

Missed
Projected
15–18
Final
41–14
Projected winner
Cory-Rawson
Margin error
30.8

Aug 21, 2026

Ada vs. Upper Scioto Valley

Missed
Projected
18–25
Final
30–0
Projected winner
Upper Scioto Valley
Margin error
36.6

Aug 21, 2026

Salineville Southern vs. Toronto

Correct
Projected
17–26
Final
0–33
Projected winner
Toronto
Margin error
23.2

Aug 21, 2026

Sebring McKinley vs. Kennedy Catholic

Missed
Projected
19–18
Final
22–38
Projected winner
Sebring McKinley
Margin error
17.4

Aug 21, 2026

Monroeville vs. McComb

Correct
Projected
23–26
Final
14–48
Projected winner
McComb
Margin error
31.8

Aug 21, 2026

Dalton vs. Danville

Missed
Projected
24–23
Final
12–48
Projected winner
Dalton
Margin error
36.2

Aug 21, 2026

Buckeye Central vs. Crestline

Correct
Projected
20–16
Final
35–7
Projected winner
Buckeye Central
Margin error
24.6

Aug 21, 2026

Triad vs. Ridgedale

Missed
Projected
18–19
Final
40–2
Projected winner
Ridgedale
Margin error
38.4

Aug 21, 2026

National Trail vs. Springfield Catholic Central

Correct
Projected
22–16
Final
53–8
Projected winner
National Trail
Margin error
39.0

Aug 21, 2026

Minster vs. Fort Loramie

Missed
Projected
18–25
Final
27–17
Projected winner
Fort Loramie
Margin error
17.1

Aug 21, 2026

Chillicothe Huntington vs. Newark Catholic

Missed
Projected
21–18
Final
27–28
Projected winner
Chillicothe Huntington
Margin error
4.0

Aug 21, 2026

Dixie vs. New Miami

Correct
Projected
17–16
Final
28–0
Projected winner
Dixie
Margin error
26.8

Aug 21, 2026

Dayton Christian vs. Miami East

Missed
Projected
26–19
Final
13–48
Projected winner
Dayton Christian
Margin error
42.2

Aug 21, 2026

Arcanum vs. Covington

Correct
Projected
22–23
Final
7–31
Projected winner
Covington
Margin error
23.9

Aug 21, 2026

Anna vs. Spencerville

Missed
Projected
19–22
Final
60–0
Projected winner
Spencerville
Margin error
63.2

How to interpret these numbers

Winner accuracy shows whether OSPR favored the team that won. Average margin error shows how far the projected point margin was from the final margin.

Brier score measures probability quality from 0 to 1; lower is better. Calibration compares predicted win probabilities with observed outcomes.

Small groups can swing sharply, so every percentage is shown with its evaluated game count.

Injuries, roster changes, weather, and information not reflected in recorded results may affect individual games.