Skip to main content

Public validation record

2026 Football Model Performance

These results use official OSPR projections locked before kickoff and evaluated against final scores. Mirrored schedule records and live forecasts are excluded.

Evaluated through Aug 29, 2026

Accuracy calculated Aug 31, 2026 9:52 AM EDT

Reset

Performance summary

351 games evaluated with ospr-2026.1

Games evaluated

351

Winner accuracy

61.0%

214 correct

Average margin error

23.3

Lower is better

Average score error

13.4

Per-team points

Brier score

0.229

Probability accuracy

Close projection rate

10.8%

Correct and within 7

Regular season vs. playoffs

A direct comparison using the selected season, week, team, and OSPR model version.

Regular season

Games
351
Winner accuracy
61.0%
Margin error
23.3

Playoffs

Games
0
Winner accuracy
Margin error

Performance by week

Results for the selected model version and season phase.

Week Games Winner accuracy Margin error
Week 2 351 61.0% 23.3

Probability calibration

Observed win rate should approach the average predicted probability as sample sizes grow.

Probability Games Predicted Observed Gap Brier
10–19% 13 17.5% 23.1% +5.6 0.191
20–29% 32 26.6% 25.0% -1.6 0.190
30–39% 53 35.0% 37.7% +2.7 0.230
40–49% 96 45.6% 49.0% +3.3 0.249
50–59% 54 55.1% 51.9% -3.2 0.256
60–69% 51 65.0% 62.7% -2.2 0.232
70–79% 45 74.6% 73.3% -1.2 0.192
80–89% 7 82.9% 71.4% -11.4 0.213

Performance by prediction confidence

Newer snapshots use historical calibration and comparable sample size. Legacy snapshots fall back to rating-evidence confidence.

Confidence Games Winner accuracy Average margin error
High 252 55.6% 22.8 points
Medium 21 76.2% 21.5 points
Low 78 74.4% 25.2 points

Performance by risk indicator

A game may appear in more than one group because indicators describe different kinds of uncertainty.

Indicator Games Winner accuracy Average margin error
Limited Data 351 61.0% 23.3 points
Close Game 273 57.5% 23.1 points
Upset Possible 253 55.7% 22.8 points

Largest misses

The largest margin errors in this selection. A miss is a model result to learn from, not automatically a data error.

Date Matchup Projected Final Margin error
Aug 29, 2026 Warrensville Heights vs. Cleveland JFK 18–20 57–0 59.2 points
Aug 28, 2026 West Clermont vs. Anderson 24–17 19–70 58.8 points
Aug 28, 2026 Ross vs. Thurgood Marshall 19–20 57–0 57.4 points
Aug 29, 2026 John Marshall vs. Rocky River 17–24 0–63 56.8 points
Aug 28, 2026 Wayne Trace vs. Spencerville 18–19 55–0 56.2 points

Evaluated games

The game-level record behind the summary above.

Aug 29, 2026

Gamble Montessori vs. Millersport

Correct
Projected
24–21
Final
46–13
Projected winner
Gamble Montessori
Margin error
30.1

Aug 29, 2026

Elyria vs. Lorain

Correct
Projected
19–20
Final
22–42
Projected winner
Lorain
Margin error
19.8

Aug 29, 2026

Lima Central Catholic vs. Delphos St. John's

Correct
Projected
25–20
Final
41–0
Projected winner
Lima Central Catholic
Margin error
36.1

Aug 29, 2026

Fairport Harding vs. Ashtabula St. John

Missed
Projected
22–18
Final
0–33
Projected winner
Fairport Harding
Margin error
36.9

Aug 29, 2026

Warrensville Heights vs. Cleveland JFK

Missed
Projected
18–20
Final
57–0
Projected winner
Cleveland JFK
Margin error
59.2

Aug 29, 2026

Eastmoor Academy vs. Cincinnati College Prep

Correct
Projected
16–25
Final
12–38
Projected winner
Cincinnati College Prep
Margin error
17.5

Aug 29, 2026

Akron Garfield vs. Revere

Missed
Projected
21–18
Final
12–28
Projected winner
Akron Garfield
Margin error
18.3

Aug 29, 2026

John Marshall vs. Rocky River

Correct
Projected
17–24
Final
0–63
Projected winner
Rocky River
Margin error
56.8

Aug 28, 2026

Brooklyn vs. Willard

Correct
Projected
18–22
Final
0–41
Projected winner
Willard
Margin error
37.2

Aug 28, 2026

Greenup County vs. Russell

Correct
Projected
22–24
Final
22–28
Projected winner
Russell
Margin error
4.2

Aug 28, 2026

Wheeling Central Catholic vs. Perry Traditional Academy

Correct
Projected
26–15
Final
50–8
Projected winner
Wheeling Central Catholic
Margin error
30.3

Aug 28, 2026

Highlands vs. Cooper

Correct
Projected
25–23
Final
45–6
Projected winner
Highlands
Margin error
37.9

Aug 28, 2026

Sidney Lehman vs. Southeastern Local

Correct
Projected
18–24
Final
8–14
Projected winner
Southeastern Local
Margin error
0.0

Aug 28, 2026

Fayetteville-Perry vs. Portsmouth Notre Dame

Missed
Projected
25–16
Final
6–27
Projected winner
Fayetteville-Perry
Margin error
29.5

Aug 28, 2026

Springfield Catholic Central vs. Troy Christian

Correct
Projected
19–23
Final
0–42
Projected winner
Troy Christian
Margin error
37.4

Aug 28, 2026

Bradford vs. Twin Valley South

Missed
Projected
19–20
Final
28–8
Projected winner
Twin Valley South
Margin error
20.7

Aug 28, 2026

Frontier vs. Magnolia

Correct
Projected
25–15
Final
45–14
Projected winner
Frontier
Margin error
21.3

Aug 28, 2026

Fisher Catholic vs. Tuscarawas Central Catholic

Correct
Projected
23–17
Final
28–22
Projected winner
Fisher Catholic
Margin error
0.2

Aug 28, 2026

Reedsville Eastern vs. Miller

Missed
Projected
19–20
Final
34–8
Projected winner
Miller
Margin error
26.2

Aug 28, 2026

Fairfield Christian vs. Trimble

Correct
Projected
19–20
Final
0–42
Projected winner
Trimble
Margin error
41.6

Aug 28, 2026

Caldwell vs. Waterford

Correct
Projected
23–24
Final
8–15
Projected winner
Waterford
Margin error
6.8

Aug 28, 2026

Bishop Rosecrans vs. Conotton Valley

Correct
Projected
17–25
Final
13–62
Projected winner
Conotton Valley
Margin error
41.6

Aug 28, 2026

Lima Perry vs. Ridgemont

Missed
Projected
19–20
Final
42–0
Projected winner
Ridgemont
Margin error
42.3

Aug 28, 2026

Leipsic vs. McComb

Missed
Projected
23–24
Final
26–7
Projected winner
McComb
Margin error
19.6

Aug 28, 2026

Mohawk vs. Cardington-Lincoln

Correct
Projected
21–20
Final
56–14
Projected winner
Mohawk
Margin error
41.2

How to interpret these numbers

Winner accuracy shows whether OSPR favored the team that won. Average margin error shows how far the projected point margin was from the final margin.

Brier score measures probability quality from 0 to 1; lower is better. Calibration compares predicted win probabilities with observed outcomes.

Small groups can swing sharply, so every percentage is shown with its evaluated game count.

Injuries, roster changes, weather, and information not reflected in recorded results may affect individual games.