Games evaluated
348
Public validation record
2026 Football Model Performance
These results use official OSPR projections locked before kickoff and evaluated against final scores. Mirrored schedule records and live forecasts are excluded.
Evaluated through Oct 10, 2026
Accuracy calculated Oct 11, 2026 8:00 AM EDT
Performance summary
348 games evaluated with ospr-2026.1
Winner accuracy
71.3%
248 correct
Average margin error
21.8
Lower is better
Average score error
13.3
Per-team points
Brier score
0.181
Probability accuracy
Close projection rate
15.2%
Correct and within 7
Regular season vs. playoffs
A direct comparison using the selected season, week, team, and OSPR model version.
Regular season
- Games
- 348
- Winner accuracy
- 71.3%
- Margin error
- 21.8
Playoffs
- Games
- 0
- Winner accuracy
- —
- Margin error
- —
Performance by week
Results for the selected model version and season phase.
| Week | Games | Winner accuracy | Margin error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 8 | 348 | 71.3% | 21.8 |
Probability calibration
Observed win rate should approach the average predicted probability as sample sizes grow.
| Probability | Games | Predicted | Observed | Gap | Brier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–9% | 6 | 8.1% | 16.7% | +8.6 | 0.140 |
| 10–19% | 37 | 15.2% | 5.4% | -9.8 | 0.061 |
| 20–29% | 27 | 25.0% | 22.2% | -2.7 | 0.171 |
| 30–39% | 40 | 35.2% | 27.5% | -7.7 | 0.193 |
| 40–49% | 63 | 45.3% | 49.2% | +3.9 | 0.249 |
| 50–59% | 59 | 55.2% | 59.3% | +4.2 | 0.243 |
| 60–69% | 37 | 64.3% | 59.5% | -4.9 | 0.232 |
| 70–79% | 48 | 74.9% | 83.3% | +8.4 | 0.140 |
| 80–89% | 27 | 84.3% | 92.6% | +8.3 | 0.075 |
| 90–99% | 4 | 91.4% | 100.0% | +8.6 | 0.007 |
Performance by prediction confidence
Newer snapshots use historical calibration and comparable sample size. Legacy snapshots fall back to rating-evidence confidence.
| Confidence | Games | Winner accuracy | Average margin error |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | 338 | 70.7% | 21.6 points |
| Medium | 10 | 90.0% | 28.3 points |
| Low | 0 | — | — |
Performance by risk indicator
A game may appear in more than one group because indicators describe different kinds of uncertainty.
| Indicator | Games | Winner accuracy | Average margin error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Close Game | 210 | 59.5% | 19.5 points |
| Upset Possible | 199 | 59.3% | 19.4 points |
| Limited Data | 5 | 40.0% | 26.0 points |
| Blowout Range | 1 | 100.0% | 23.8 points |
Largest misses
The largest margin errors in this selection. A miss is a model result to learn from, not automatically a data error.
| Date | Matchup | Projected | Final | Margin error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | Bellbrook vs. Monroe | 21–26 | 56–0 | 60.6 points |
| Oct 9, 2026 | Norwalk vs. Perkins | 12–29 | 0–75 | 58.3 points |
| Oct 9, 2026 | Erie Mason vs. Whiteford | 14–28 | 0–72 | 58.0 points |
| Oct 9, 2026 | Waterford vs. Federal Hocking | 25–15 | 68–0 | 58.0 points |
| Oct 9, 2026 | Blanchester vs. Williamsburg | 23–20 | 18–69 | 54.3 points |
Evaluated games
The game-level record behind the summary above.
Oct 9, 2026
Fairview vs. Antwerp
- Projected
- 26–18
- Final
- 42–6
- Projected winner
- Fairview
- Margin error
- 28.2
Oct 9, 2026
Delta vs. Liberty Center
- Projected
- 24–27
- Final
- 14–52
- Projected winner
- Liberty Center
- Margin error
- 35.3
Oct 9, 2026
Ashland Crestview vs. Western Reserve
- Projected
- 13–28
- Final
- 8–46
- Projected winner
- Western Reserve
- Margin error
- 22.7
Oct 9, 2026
Columbus Grove vs. Fort Loramie
- Projected
- 26–21
- Final
- 35–20
- Projected winner
- Columbus Grove
- Margin error
- 10.3
Oct 9, 2026
Colonel Crawford vs. Mohawk
- Projected
- 21–26
- Final
- 27–31
- Projected winner
- Mohawk
- Margin error
- 0.7
Oct 9, 2026
Carey vs. Hopewell-Loudon
- Projected
- 20–29
- Final
- 14–42
- Projected winner
- Hopewell-Loudon
- Margin error
- 18.4
Oct 9, 2026
Bluffton vs. Convoy Crestview
- Projected
- 30–14
- Final
- 49–12
- Projected winner
- Bluffton
- Margin error
- 21.8
Oct 9, 2026
Archbold vs. Patrick Henry
- Projected
- 28–21
- Final
- 44–8
- Projected winner
- Archbold
- Margin error
- 28.7
Oct 9, 2026
NM Springfield vs. BC Western Reserve
- Projected
- 23–21
- Final
- 41–0
- Projected winner
- NM Springfield
- Margin error
- 38.7
Oct 9, 2026
St. Thomas Aquinas vs. Leetonia
- Projected
- 17–19
- Final
- 12–20
- Projected winner
- Leetonia
- Margin error
- 5.5
Oct 9, 2026
Norwayne vs. Smithville
- Projected
- 22–26
- Final
- 31–25
- Projected winner
- Smithville
- Margin error
- 10.1
Oct 9, 2026
Campbell Memorial vs. Mineral Ridge
- Projected
- 16–29
- Final
- 14–59
- Projected winner
- Mineral Ridge
- Margin error
- 32.0
Oct 9, 2026
Hillsdale vs. Rittman
- Projected
- 27–18
- Final
- 34–7
- Projected winner
- Hillsdale
- Margin error
- 18.2
Oct 9, 2026
East Palestine vs. Pymatuning Valley
- Projected
- 22–19
- Final
- 29–28
- Projected winner
- East Palestine
- Margin error
- 1.0
Oct 9, 2026
East Canton vs. Strasburg-Franklin
- Projected
- 21–25
- Final
- 32–19
- Projected winner
- Strasburg-Franklin
- Margin error
- 16.6
Oct 9, 2026
Columbiana vs. Wellsville
- Projected
- 23–15
- Final
- 42–8
- Projected winner
- Columbiana
- Margin error
- 25.6
Oct 9, 2026
Canton Central Catholic vs. Warren JFK
- Projected
- 23–22
- Final
- 20–6
- Projected winner
- Canton Central Catholic
- Margin error
- 13.6
Oct 9, 2026
West Liberty-Salem vs. Triad
- Projected
- 21–18
- Final
- 49–14
- Projected winner
- West Liberty-Salem
- Margin error
- 32.2
Oct 9, 2026
Versailles vs. Delphos St. John's
- Projected
- 19–20
- Final
- 49–0
- Projected winner
- Delphos St. John's
- Margin error
- 49.5
Oct 9, 2026
Preble Shawnee vs. Tri-County North
- Projected
- 24–22
- Final
- 48–27
- Projected winner
- Preble Shawnee
- Margin error
- 18.5
Oct 9, 2026
Mariemont vs. Reading
- Projected
- 19–22
- Final
- 22–14
- Projected winner
- Reading
- Margin error
- 10.8
Oct 9, 2026
Madison Plains vs. Cedarville
- Projected
- 26–17
- Final
- 50–6
- Projected winner
- Madison Plains
- Margin error
- 35.0
Oct 9, 2026
East Clinton vs. Fayetteville-Perry
- Projected
- 14–23
- Final
- 20–30
- Projected winner
- Fayetteville-Perry
- Margin error
- 0.9
Oct 9, 2026
Clark Montessori vs. North College Hill
- Projected
- 15–30
- Final
- 0–62
- Projected winner
- North College Hill
- Margin error
- 47.3
Oct 9, 2026
Cincinnati Hills CA vs. Purcell Marian
- Projected
- 27–17
- Final
- 37–0
- Projected winner
- Cincinnati Hills CA
- Margin error
- 27.6
| Date | Matchup | Projected | Final | Projected winner | Actual winner | Margin error | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | 26–18 | 42–6 | Fairview | Fairview | 28.2 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 24–27 | 14–52 | Liberty Center | Liberty Center | 35.3 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 13–28 | 8–46 | Western Reserve | Western Reserve | 22.7 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 26–21 | 35–20 | Columbus Grove | Columbus Grove | 10.3 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 21–26 | 27–31 | Mohawk | Mohawk | 0.7 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 20–29 | 14–42 | Hopewell-Loudon | Hopewell-Loudon | 18.4 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 30–14 | 49–12 | Bluffton | Bluffton | 21.8 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 28–21 | 44–8 | Archbold | Archbold | 28.7 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 23–21 | 41–0 | NM Springfield | NM Springfield | 38.7 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 17–19 | 12–20 | Leetonia | Leetonia | 5.5 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 22–26 | 31–25 | Smithville | Norwayne | 10.1 | Missed | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 16–29 | 14–59 | Mineral Ridge | Mineral Ridge | 32.0 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 27–18 | 34–7 | Hillsdale | Hillsdale | 18.2 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 22–19 | 29–28 | East Palestine | East Palestine | 1.0 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 21–25 | 32–19 | Strasburg-Franklin | East Canton | 16.6 | Missed | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 23–15 | 42–8 | Columbiana | Columbiana | 25.6 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 23–22 | 20–6 | Canton Central Catholic | Canton Central Catholic | 13.6 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 21–18 | 49–14 | West Liberty-Salem | West Liberty-Salem | 32.2 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 19–20 | 49–0 | Delphos St. John's | Versailles | 49.5 | Missed | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 24–22 | 48–27 | Preble Shawnee | Preble Shawnee | 18.5 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 19–22 | 22–14 | Reading | Mariemont | 10.8 | Missed | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 26–17 | 50–6 | Madison Plains | Madison Plains | 35.0 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 14–23 | 20–30 | Fayetteville-Perry | Fayetteville-Perry | 0.9 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 15–30 | 0–62 | North College Hill | North College Hill | 47.3 | Correct | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | 27–17 | 37–0 | Cincinnati Hills CA | Cincinnati Hills CA | 27.6 | Correct |
How to interpret these numbers
Winner accuracy shows whether OSPR favored the team that won. Average margin error shows how far the projected point margin was from the final margin.
Brier score measures probability quality from 0 to 1; lower is better. Calibration compares predicted win probabilities with observed outcomes.
Small groups can swing sharply, so every percentage is shown with its evaluated game count.
Injuries, roster changes, weather, and information not reflected in recorded results may affect individual games.