2026 Division II Region 7 Standings
25 schools
Official Harbin Standings with OSPR Rankings
Harbin rank determines playoff qualification. OSPR rank compares team strength within the region. The preserved preseason rank remains visible for comparison.
Harbin Points Rankings
Official OHSAA playoff standings
| Rank | School | W/L | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Pre #1 | 10-0 | 38.9500 L1 63.00 · L2 326.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 2 Pre #2 | 9-0 | 38.3242 L1 51.50 · L2 319.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 3 Pre #11 | 9-1 | 37.7099 L1 50.50 · L2 260.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 4 Pre #23 | 8-2 | 28.5500 L1 50.50 · L2 235.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 5 Pre #3 | 8-3 | 26.8455 L1 50.00 · L2 223.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 6 Pre #7 | 8-3 | 26.7469 L1 47.00 · L2 218.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 7 Pre #17 | 9-2 | 25.8840 L1 53.50 · L2 206.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 8 Pre #13 | 9-2 | 24.6136 L1 48.00 · L2 202.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 9 Pre #6 | 7-4 | 18.0273 L1 35.50 · L2 148.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 10 Pre #5 | 5-6 | 14.2727 L1 30.50 · L2 115.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 11 Pre #12 | 6-5 | 13.3909 L1 34.00 · L2 103.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 12 Pre #14 | 6-5 | 12.4000 L1 33.00 · L2 94.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 13 Pre #20 | 5-5 | 12.1429 L1 28.50 · L2 92.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 14 Pre #8 | 4-6 | 11.7434 L1 24.00 · L2 92.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 15 Pre #15 | 5-5 | 11.3000 L1 30.50 · L2 82.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 16 Pre #18 | 5-5 | 8.6000 L1 28.00 · L2 58.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 17 Pre #10 | 5-5 | 7.9500 L1 26.00 · L2 53.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 18 Pre #16 | 3-7 | 7.2000 L1 16.50 · L2 55.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 19 Pre #9 | 3-7 | 7.1500 L1 18.00 · L2 53.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 20 Pre #21 | 3-7 | 6.7500 L1 15.50 · L2 52.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 21 Pre #22 | 3-7 | 6.1000 L1 17.00 · L2 44.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 22 Pre #4 | 2-8 | 2.9000 L1 11.50 · L2 17.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 23 Pre #24 | 1-9 | 2.0000 L1 5.50 · L2 14.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 24 Pre #19 | 1-9 | 0.6000 L1 6.00 · L2 0.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 25 Pre #25 | 0-10 | 0.0000 L1 0.00 · L2 0.00 L2 divisor 100 |
OSPR Rankings
Team strength within this region
| Rank | School | W/L | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9-0 | 72.7 Tier A | |
| 2 | 10-0 | 70.3 Tier A | |
| 3 | 9-1 | 64.7 Tier B | |
| 4 | 9-2 | 63.0 Tier B | |
| 5 | 8-3 | 60.5 Tier B | |
| 6 | 8-2 | 60.1 Tier B | |
| 7 | 7-4 | 59.6 Tier B | |
| 8 | 8-3 | 57.7 Tier B | |
| 8 | 9-2 | 57.7 Tier B | |
| 10 | 6-5 | 51.9 Tier C | |
| 11 | 5-5 | 51.4 Tier C | |
| 11 | 6-5 | 51.4 Tier C | |
| 13 | 5-5 | 51.1 Tier C | |
| 14 | 5-6 | 49.4 Tier C | |
| 15 | 3-7 | 48.8 Tier C | |
| 16 | 5-5 | 48.4 Tier C | |
| 17 | 4-6 | 47.8 Tier C | |
| 18 | 5-5 | 46.8 Tier C | |
| 19 | 3-7 | 45.1 Tier C | |
| 20 | 3-7 | 44.1 Tier C | |
| 21 | 3-7 | 43.3 Tier C | |
| 22 | 2-8 | 40.6 Tier C | |
| 23 | 1-9 | 33.4 Tier D | |
| 24 | 1-9 | 30.0 Tier D | |
| 25 | 0-10 | 27.6 Tier D |
