2026 Division III Region 11 Standings
25 schools
Official Harbin Standings with OSPR Rankings
Harbin rank determines playoff qualification. OSPR rank compares team strength within the region. The preserved preseason rank remains visible for comparison.
Harbin Points Rankings
Official OHSAA playoff standings
| Rank | School | W/L | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Pre #1 | 10-0 | 29.9500 L1 55.50 · L2 244.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 2 Pre #4 | 8-2 | 28.4660 L1 46.00 · L2 231.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 3 Pre #3 | 9-1 | 25.8566 L1 52.00 · L2 204.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 4 Pre #7 | 9-2 | 25.2364 L1 51.00 · L2 206.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 5 Pre #14 | 9-2 | 24.0182 L1 47.50 · L2 197.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 6 Pre #2 | 8-3 | 23.0182 L1 42.00 · L2 192.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 7 Pre #10 | 8-3 | 22.9909 L1 45.00 · L2 189.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 8 Pre #12 | 9-1 | 20.8000 L1 44.00 · L2 164.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 9 Pre #5 | 9-2 | 17.2955 L1 50.00 · L2 127.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 10 Pre #16 | 7-4 | 17.0707 L1 35.00 · L2 137.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 11 Pre #8 | 7-4 | 15.4364 L1 34.50 · L2 123.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 12 Pre #15 | 8-3 | 14.0364 L1 45.50 · L2 99.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 13 Pre #25 | 5-5 | 10.9500 L1 29.00 · L2 80.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 14 Pre #22 | 6-4 | 10.7000 L1 32.50 · L2 74.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 15 Pre #19 | 4-6 | 9.5227 L1 22.50 · L2 72.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 16 Pre #17 | 5-5 | 8.8000 L1 23.00 · L2 65.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 17 Pre #6 | 2-7 | 8.2828 L1 10.00 · L2 71.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 18 Pre #18 | 5-5 | 7.8000 L1 27.00 · L2 51.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 19 Pre #20 | 5-5 | 7.3000 L1 23.00 · L2 50.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 20 Pre #9 | 2-8 | 5.3146 L1 12.00 · L2 39.50 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 21 Pre #21 | 3-7 | 4.2293 L1 13.00 · L2 29.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 22 Pre #11 | 3-7 | 3.9753 L1 14.50 · L2 25.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 23 Pre #24 | 2-8 | 2.3500 L1 10.50 · L2 13.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 24 Pre #23 | 2-8 | 1.8000 L1 12.00 · L2 6.00 L2 divisor 100 | |
| 25 Pre #13 | 0-10 | 0.0000 L1 0.00 · L2 0.00 L2 divisor 100 |
OSPR Rankings
Team strength within this region
| Rank | School | W/L | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10-0 | 68.4 Tier B | |
| 2 | 9-1 | 66.1 Tier B | |
| 3 | 9-1 | 65.7 Tier B | |
| 4 | 9-2 | 64.7 Tier B | |
| 5 | 8-2 | 63.9 Tier B | |
| 6 | 9-2 | 61.8 Tier B | |
| 7 | 9-2 | 61.3 Tier B | |
| 8 | 8-3 | 60.7 Tier B | |
| 9 | 7-4 | 59.8 Tier B | |
| 10 | 8-3 | 58.4 Tier B | |
| 11 | 7-4 | 58.0 Tier B | |
| 12 | 8-3 | 57.5 Tier B | |
| 13 | 6-4 | 53.1 Tier C | |
| 14 | 5-5 | 50.5 Tier C | |
| 15 | 5-5 | 50.4 Tier C | |
| 16 | 5-5 | 49.3 Tier C | |
| 17 | 5-5 | 48.9 Tier C | |
| 17 | 4-6 | 48.9 Tier C | |
| 19 | 2-8 | 41.3 Tier C | |
| 20 | 2-8 | 40.2 Tier C | |
| 21 | 3-7 | 39.8 Tier D | |
| 22 | 3-7 | 39.4 Tier D | |
| 23 | 2-8 | 39.1 Tier D | |
| 24 | 2-7 | 36.8 Tier D | |
| 25 | 0-10 | 29.9 Tier D |
